Read the open letter from the principals of WCH Bermuda Country Council calling for the immediate suspension of Covid-19 mRNA products.
11 June 2025
To: Mr. Ian Stein, BA, MA
Good day Mr. Stein,
We the principals of the Bermuda Country Council of the World Council for Health (“WCH Bermuda”) bring our concerns to you as professionals in the healthcare fields regarding the continued calls for receiving boosters of the COVID-19 modified mRNA ‘vaccine’ and other vaccines. We have all witnessed within our community the
deterioration of physical and mental health along with increased mortality temporaneous to the administration of these injections.
This request is not unique to Bermuda and has been expressed by numerous physicians overseas encapsulated in points 1. through 5. adapted from the Hope Accord inclusive of Bermuda statistics. WCH Bermuda experts added points 6. and 7. considering more diverse modified mRNA products are due to be released and marketed.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, SCIENTISTS AND CONCERNED MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, CALL FOR:
THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE COVID-19 mRNA ‘VACCINE’ PRODUCTS
A growing body of evidence ( https://thehopeaccord.org/resources#evidence ) suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’ products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths.
The association observed between the ‘vaccine’ rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings. These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomised clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link.
This new technology was granted emergency use authorisation to address a situation that no longer exists. Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they are not resulting in net harm. Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution.
Statistics from the Government of Bermuda Ministry of Health (“Ministry of Health”) Surveillance Summary Report weeks 9-12 of 2025 showed:
– no incidences of laboratory confirmed COVID-19 Infection
– below average severe acute respiratory infections requiring hospitalisation
– higher than expected influenza cases. Of note was the absence of Influenza cases during the COVID-19 monitoring period from 2020-2022.
To date, the ‘vaccine’ has failed to prevent infection with the COVID viruses. This proves that the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ is not required by anyone, especially infants.
2. A COMPREHENSIVE RE-EVALUATION OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ALL COVID-19 ‘VACCINE’ PRODUCTS
Independent investigations must be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive revaluation of all Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ products. This has not been done, and only after court order were the clinical findings of pre-marketing adverse effects published for general knowledge. Therefore, the World Health Organisation, Pan American Health Organisation and other advisors to the Ministry of Health were without data to validate the claim of safety or effectiveness of this and associated products.
There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their impact on the human body, both short and long term. Effectiveness must be reassessed through a comprehensive review of actual clinical impact on illness and mortality, as opposed to synthetic results based on modelled assumptions.
We call on the scientific community to come forward with findings from unpublished Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ studies. This will help mitigate publication bias, whereby unfavourable results were often rejected or withheld due to fears of reputational damage. Crucially, government bodies and the pharmaceutical industry must also provide full transparency, granting access to previously undisclosed anonymised patient-level data from clinical trials and surveillance programs. These cumulative actions will help determine any real-world benefit of these products versus the true extent of the damage caused.
3. THE IMMEDIATE RECOGNITION AND SUPPORT FOR THE ‘VACCINE’-INJURED
The denial of ‘vaccine’ injury is a betrayal of those who followed official directives, often under coercion from mandates restricting their access to work, education, travel, hospitality and sports.
The ‘vaccine’-injured must be recognised and every effort made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.
4. THE RESTORATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES ABANDONED DURING THE COVID-19 ERA
The four fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded on the false premise of an emergency. These included: Autonomy (genuine informed consent, truth-telling, confidentiality and protection against coercion), Non-maleficence (first, do no harm), Beneficence (the physician must act for the benefit of the patient), Justice (fair and equitable treatment) and the forgotten notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. The precautionary principle was inverted.
Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld. The consequence was exposing the public, especially healthy young people – including children – to unacceptable risks of physical, developmental and mental harm.
These ethical concepts are thoroughly established in the profession of medicine. We believe that physicians must know the ethical tenets of their profession, because if they do not know them, they cannot follow them. Emergencies of any kind are never a reason to abandon our medical principles and ethical responsibilities; it is precisely at such times that we most profoundly depend on them. Only after acknowledging they were wrongly abandoned can we commit to upholding them consistently and in doing so, better protect future generations.
5. ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF OUR CURRENT PREDICAMENT
The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. The unethical, blind faith in vaccines is the preeminent sacred cow of modern medicine. It is a quasi religious, dogmatic article of conviction, rather than a sound scientific theory or empirically based clinical precept.
By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the Covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to establish the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned.
An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.
We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health.
6. GOVERNMENT MANDATES REGARDING HEALTH PRODUCTS
It is also imperative that the Officers of the Government of Bermuda avoid placing restrictions on physicians and veterinarians to prescribe any medication or health supplement for their patients. Mandating the use or obstructing the acquisition of any product by a government agency ignores the consideration of each individual’s unique health requirements, thereby is akin to practicing medicine without a license. See the testimonies and witness statements from the Hope Accord below, and the individual testimonies of affected patients in Bermuda (in progress of documentation).
7. LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
We urgently request for the lawmakers to revoke all legislation relating to vaccine manufacturer liability protection, returning vaccines to the same liability status as all other medicinal products. Once this liability protection is removed from the laws, the manufacturers will be motivated to conduct proper safety studies on all products labelled and marketed as vaccines. Currently the British government is entrusted to compensate the injured, which, if extended to the Government of Bermuda, creates an undue burden on our budget.
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uk/britain-to
spend-37-billion-on-vaccines-and-bear-liability-watchdog-says-idUSKBN28Q013/
We also request the modified mRNA products be correctly labelled and transparently marketed as GENE-ALTERING MEDICATIONS. The current trend in labelling these as ‘vaccines’ is fraudulent.
Important Note
The Hope Accord is an independent initiative and is not affiliated with any other organisation. The text of the Accord stands on its own, and by signing the Accord, we are not endorsing these additional resources. However, you may find the following information useful for further context and understanding.
Growing Body of Evidence
The Hope Accord refers to a “growing body of evidence” suggesting concerns about modified mRNA products. While the full extent of this evidence encompasses hundreds of studies and reports, we provide here a selection of resources from our founders that together offer comprehensive overviews and analyses of the available data.
– People’s ‘vaccine’ Enquiry Witness Statements A UK initiative providing expert testimony on COVID-19 ‘vaccine’s. Several Hope Accord founders contributed, including:
– “Unsafe and Defective” by Clare Craig (2024) Comprehensive aggregation of key evidence related to concerns raised in the Hope Accord.
– Doctors for Patients UK (DfPUK) Testimonies (2024) Observations from some of the UK Hope Accord founders, based on professional experiences and data analyses.
– “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’s Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine Part 1” by Aseem Malhotra (2022)
Reviews evidence from trials and real-world data on mRNA COVID ‘vaccine’s, highlighting risk-benefit concerns and informed consent issues.
“Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials” by Joseph Fraiman et al. (2022)
– Reanalyses Pfizer and Moderna trial data, finding an excess risk of serious adverse events in mRNA
‘vaccine’ recipients compared to placebo groups.
Root-Cause Analysis
The following resources delve into the underlying systemic and cultural factors that contributed to the issues addressed by the Hope Accord:
“Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccine’s Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine – Part 2” by Aseem Malhotra (2022) Examines root causes of public health failures during the pandemic, discussing regulatory capture and the need to rebuild trust in health institutions.
Beyond Blame: Dissecting the Systemic Roots of Societal Disease of the Covid Era by Tim Kelly (2024) Explores factors leading to current issues,including hyper-specialisation and centralisation. Proposes priorities for addressing the crisis.
Please note that the inclusion of these resources does not imply endorsement of all views expressed within them by all signatories of the Hope Accord. They are provided for informational purposes only. We the members of the Bermuda Country Council welcome your consideration and dialogue after reading the articles quoted above.
To your best health,
WCH Bermuda Country Council Members
cc.:
Minister of Health
Permanent Secretary of Health
Chief Medical Officer
Bermuda Medical Doctors Association
Bermuda Members of Parliament
His Excellency the Governor
His Excellency the Deputy Governor
PAHO/WHO Representative for Bermuda
