… setting. While battling recurrent and metastatic sarcoma, recovering from open-heart surgery, and undergoing aggressive chemotherapy, Dr. Zelenko developed his now-famous “Zelenko Protocol,” which has saved lives all around the world.

In December 2020, Dr. Zelenko with co-authors published an article on a retrospective case study of outpatient treatment with zinc, low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, which indicated a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalization of COVID-19 patients that had been treated with the protocol, 2.8% treated compared with 15.4% untreated.

Zelenko was also a courageous advocate …

… represent part of a general narrowing of your approach to openness in science. We have been invited to submit the findings to a peer-reviewed journal in a more consolidated form so will continue on this path.”

Co-author and member of the WCH Steering Committee Dr. Kat Lindley told WCH, “The Control Group survey report uploaded to and recently pulled by ResearchGate, showed that severe Covid is rare in people who did not receive the products and instead relied on natural immunity, self-care, early treatment protocols, and a healthy lifestyle. It is a shame when scientific discourse …

Following the release of the TOGETHER Trial results to the press in August 2021, media headlines quoted that ivermectin had ’no effect whatsoever’ when used for Covid-19. This press release from TOGETHER Trial investigators influenced international health policy to withhold ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 despite compelling evidence from numerous independent experts, scientific papers, and real world data that mass administration of ivermectin would be effective and safe for Covid-19.

The final report of the TOGETHER Trial, published in March 2022 in the New England Journal of Medicine, has major discrepancies in the data …

… of the opinion that bodily integrity is protected under Article 21 of the Constitution and no individual can be forced to be vaccinated. Further, personal autonomy of an individual, which is a recognized facet of the protections guaranteed under Article 21, encompasses the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment in the sphere of individual health.”

The court also said that “no data” had been shown to them to refute the “emerging scientific opinion which appears to indicate that the risk of transmission of the virus from unvaccinated individuals is almost on par with that from vaccinated persons.” While …

… no evidence that Remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients.”

Despite this and a continued lack of evidence supporting the use of Remdesivir, doctors in the United States and in the United Kingdom have continued using the drug. Multiple studies have concluded that Remdesivir is not efficacious for treating Covid-19.

According to Dr Paul Marik, the drug “increases the risk of death and acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with Covid.” Dr Marik told WCH that “the use of this drug in hospitalized patients is medical malpractice.”

At the same time, there has been a long-term …

… strategy may not be appropriate. As we have previously warned, mass vaccination during a pandemic does not often have the advertised effect. Given the fact that the Epstein-Barr Virus is carried by a significant portion of the global population, the virus is now endemic.

While no specific conventional medical treatments have been established for treating recurrent or chronic EBV, sufficient evidence exists that many people are healing naturally from EBV. Research has identified medicinal plants as candidates that may be efficacious in treating and eradicating the Epstein-Barr Virus. Due to the overwhelming prevalence of EBV in the global