New Zealand Human Rights Advocates Call for Immediate Exit from WHO Pandemic Treaty Amid ICC Complaint

WELLINGTON, AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND | 14 MAY 2025 — In a formal communication submitted to the New Zealand Parliament’s Foreign Affairs division, a coalition of human rights advocates, led by Rongo Whakawa, has called for the government to immediately withdraw from the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty and exit the WHO altogether. This demand follows the filing of a formal complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing New Zealand officials and international partners of genocide and crimes against humanity.

The complaint is rooted in allegations of grave violations under Articles 6 to 8 bis of the Rome Statute, specifically citing the deployment of biological weapons on New Zealand’s population under the guise of emergency health declarations. The submission argues that experimental Covid-19 countermeasures — distributed during the pandemic — were falsely promoted as safe and effective but are now alleged to contain biological weapon components, including toxic lipid nanoparticles, plasmid DNA, and SV-40 virus fragments far exceeding permissible safety thresholds.

There is mounting evidence that these substances, delivered under fraudulent emergency authorisations, may cause long-term genetic harm,” the letter states. “The New Zealand Government, operating under the corporate entity of the ‘Crown in right of New Zealand,’ has failed in its duty to protect both the general population and the Indigenous Māori people.

WHO Leadership Under Scrutiny

The communication also points to multiple complaints filed with the ICC against WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, citing his alleged collusion with organisations implicated in a broader depopulation agenda and global governance takeover. This assertion is reinforced by Dr. David Martin’s testimony to the European Parliament, which describes the WHO’s influence as a form of “global tyranny,” and echoes Professor Michel Chossudovsky’s analysis of a “global coup d’état against humanity.”

Links to these statements were provided:

Human Rights Violations and Legal Frameworks

The letter further references violations of key international legal instruments, including:

  • The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
  • The Nuremberg Code (1946)
  • The Declaration of Helsinki (1948)
  • The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 7
  • The 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act

International human rights lawyer Dr. Willem van Aardt is cited as having provided expert opinion on these breaches, asserting that millions of New Zealanders were subjected to coercion, misinformation, and involuntary medical experimentation. His interviews and findings are publicly accessible:

Allegations of HIV Components and Immune Suppression

Further deepening the concern is the discovery of HIV-related sequences within the genetic makeup of the C-19 vaccine formulations. Independent researchers and platforms, including Children’s Health Defense and Anandamide Substack, report that these genetic inserts could potentially compromise immune system function.

Call for Accountability and National Sovereignty

The letter concludes by asserting that the New Zealand Government, while operating under the PREP Act and emergency military measures, is no longer able to represent the people of New Zealand in good faith. The authors contend that any treaties signed under current conditions — including the WHO Pandemic Treaty — are invalid due to coercion and violation of sovereign rights.

This is not just a legal issue, it’s a matter of life, dignity, and national survival,” says Rongo Whakawa. “We urge the government to take immediate action to restore sovereignty, demand accountability, and protect the people from further harm.

Subscribe To Our Bi-weekly Newsletter

Welcome to our new website, We have new content being added all the time, Sign up to receive regular updates.